Text response
Where do you start?
1) Read the
question. Pick out the key words. Formulate a multi-faceted contention/purpose
that demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the text, not just a
superficial one. Look at the question from all angles.
2)
INTRODUCTION:
• Contextualise for your assessor (historical, social,
text type, book name, author).
• Integrate your contention/purpose.
•
Signpost your key ideas but don’t go into intimate specifics.
• Integrate at
least 2 quotes from the text to display an immediate engagement.
• Do not
start going into specific textual examples or start mentioning ‘people’. If the
question is about a specific person, then you may use their name, otherwise
don’t list people in the intro.
• Make sure your introduction is acutely
indicative of what you will explore throughout your response. It serves as the
springboard of future ideas.
THEREFORE:
An efficient introduction
should:
• clarify and define key terms and phrases by discussing the main
issues that will be tackled.
• articulate your main argument in a confident
and assured manner - show a strong sense of authorial control.
DO
NOT:
• simply repeat the topic in your opening sentence.
• simply agree or
disagree.
• disregard the topic altogether and rewrite a pre-planned essay
that is largely irrelevant to the topic.
• begin your introduction with: “In
my opinion this statement is true…”, “I agree with the above statement”, or “In
this essay I will talk about …”, and other such like expressions. Such phrasing
is both unnecessary and begins the essay on an unsophisticated note.
2)
Paragraph 1: Idea/argument number 1.
• This has be your strongest
point.
• Topic sentence must be meaningful and leading. It must represent
your discussion for the paragraph therefore it cannot be ambiguous, a general
statement about the text or waffle. It has to be pointed and articulate and a
platform for future discussion and exposure of ideas.
• You validate your
findings with : textual evidence, explanation of characters themes, issues,
construction and also quotes: fluent integration of quotes. Quotes must not
stand alone without any connection to ideas and/or discussion.
* Make
sure you are not just retelling the story. Think: state/validate/elaborate.
* Use your linking words to make your response fluent and analytical.
http://www.smart-words.org/linking-words/transition-words.html
http://www.somers.k12.ny.us/sis/main/writing/transitional_words.html
*
Do a final sentence that adequately sums up your point for this paragraph.
*
Do not do a linking sentence at the end.
Paragraph 2:
* Begin
with recognition of previous argument by using a linking word or phrase ie
Furthermore/ in addition / moreover Funder presents the Berlin Wall as a
symbolisation of oppression that not only physically divides individuals and
systems, but also... (Whatever topic sentence may be).
* continue to back up
your topic sentence idea/argument with appropriate textual examples and
quotes.
*continue to use linking words
Paragraph 3/4
See
above.
These will be your 3 and 4th
ideas/arguments.
CONCLUSION
The final paragraph should tie up
your ideas and return quite clearly to the initial topic. Do not just summarise
your views here. A good strategy is to provide a clear, logical and thorough
response to the topic by re-expressing it to suit the way you have developed
your argument. Such a strategy assumes that you have clarified, defined and
substantiated the issues involved thoroughly in the main body of the essay.
Never introduce new ideas that have not been developed earlier in the last
paragraph. Finally, remember to finish confidently and
assertively!
*integrate at least two quotes into the conclusion.
• Avoid
concluding your essay with: “In conclusion…”, or “to sum up…”. This is a very
clumsy formulation and ends the essay on a tepid note.
overall!!!!!
ESSAY WRITING CONVENTIONS
Be a
thoroughly good writer rather than a careless or ignorant one. Practice by
getting into the habit of applying the following writing
conventions:
•
Underline or use italics for the title of the text (do
not use quotation marks).
•
Discuss the text in the present tense (not the
past tense). The text is “alive” and is being read now, in the present. The rule
is simple: discuss it in the present tense.
•
Style and Tone must be
formal (i.e. no colloquialisms, abbreviations, etc.).
•
Avoid contracting
words (“don't”, “isn't”, “i.e.”). Write the words in full (“does
not”).
•
Do not use the personal voice: “I think”, “In my opinion” — your
essay is your opinion!
•
Refer to the author's
concerns/intentions/view/values throughout the essay (e.g. "Funder is critical
of the way…" ; "Funder is ruthless in satirising the Stasi as she … or Funder is
seeking to/Funder's juxtaposition of the two system suggests" etc
•
Use the appropriate language (i.e. vocabulary and metalanguage) to write
about characters, themes, etc. Ensure you have developed a vocabulary sheet
throughout your study of the texts. We will add to ours on the Lusco 2014
blog.
•
Using Quotations. When you use quotations, you must quote exactly.
You must, however, only use the quotation if it strengthens your argument. It is
better to quote a few apt words or key lines than include large “chunks” which
are irrelevant.
— Use the ellipsis (three dots) ... when you
omit parts of a quotation.
— When you quote and you use a
word(s) that is not in the quotation itself, put the word(s) in square brackets
[ ].
— Note how quotations are used to support arguments and how
they are integrated into an argument in sample essays.
DO NOT in the
process of your discussion:
• bombard your reader with too many quotes.
Quotes should illustrate an argument or idea rather than act as a substitute for
it!
• re-narrate the story. Examiners know the plot and who the characters
are! They are interested in your ideas and views.
• simply rewrite an essay
that is not relevant to the topic.
• deviate from the topic!
Beware of
“one-track” response. Try to recognize complexities: the better answers always
do.
You may like to think of each paragraph as based on an
"equation":
One paragraph = one topic sentence (main argument) + detail
(supporting arguments) + relevant examples (textual evidence + quote) = well
rounded paragraph that explores a key argument related directly to the
topic.
Good luck and I am looking forward to reading some insightful essays.
No comments:
Post a Comment